9
esday
March
18,
1927
THE
IJXIEY
HE773
PAGE
FIVB
odes
and
loods
Modes
may
bo
merely
the
moods
of
the
moment.
-
Ileforc
buylnjr
your
jewellery
noVelties,
Investigate
the
current
styles.
We
can
jrlve
you
authentic
Information
of
this
year's
ntyles,
having
Just
returned
from
tlie
Kast.
.(OHHglMER
v.
po
4
Jewellers
cItiic
stope
with
the
clock
fHE
PIONEER
LAUNDRY
KIDS
House"
HOLD
IPROdLEM-
N6W
SHE
KNOWS
TrttPlrSCfcToifcND
THtFAMlLVS
CLOTHES
IlIFN
she
found
out
that
this
jos
the
place
to
send
the
Imlly's
clothes
she
also
distorted
that
we
would
make
her
a
ectul
rate
for
the
family
latin-Ey,
She
told
her
friends
about
land
they
told
their
friends
bout
It
and
this
is
getting
to
be
lite
a
family
laundry'.
jioneer
Laundry
Phone
118
New
arrivals
of
Spring
Coats
Suits
and
Dresses
$
Suits
that
are
In
the
ore-ront
of
fashion
for
present
rear-
-beautifully
made
jrar-nents
revealing
the
popular
ox
style
Coat
and
wra
ou
ml
Skirt.
Price
Moderate
;
BENT'S
LAI)
I
ICS
R
EA
I)
Y-TOWEA
K
Third
Avenue
ONKrv
with
Four
policy's!
EVERY
MANI
BUILT
ON
THEl
N-m-.
SQUARE
DEM
?
Dl
SH
illxCM
When
von
want
fair
and
ifi'iuare
coal
service
you
will
lo
the
rlKht
thinjt
by
yourself
In
cominjt
round
to
us.
Thn
quality
of
our
coal
and
our
conscientious
service
will
Rive
you
a
cheerful
beat-full
home
this
winter.
NANAIMQ
WELLINGTON
and
Mcl.KOI)
HIVEU
BOOTLESS
In
Lump,
Err,
Stove
and
Nut
(Albert
&
McCalTcry
'none
IIG
and
117
UNGER,
the
TAILOR
IKults
made
to
or-
iler,
In
our
shop
$50
m
low
as
223
Sixth
Street
APPEAL
CASE
IS
CONCLUDED
Al.ll.
MKPIIKNK,
NORTH
VANTOI
VF.B
AWSOU
AMI
(1.
C.
WU.KIU
IIVK
KVIIIEN'f'K
FOR
CITY
JUDGMENT
TODAY
VU,
Kiitlrltor
'fe.
'.
Jones
(lite
Forceful
Irr4nuilnn
of
Can-
In
Argument
AH
the
evidence
la,
the
Supreme
Court
appeal
case
ol
the
Canadian
National
Railway
Co.
against
the
city
assessment
waa
In
yesterday
afternoon
before
five
o'clock
when
adjournment
was
taken
for
dinner.
In
the
evening,
Mr.
Alexander,
counsel
for
the
railway,
presented
his
argument
for
the
company
and
Mr.
Jones
spoke
on
behalf
of
the
city's
case.
At
the
conclusion
of
Counsel's
argument
Mr.
Justice
Oregory
said
that
he
would
retire
to
consider
the
evidence
and
would
give
his
judgment
this
afternoon
at
2:30.
Air.
Alexander
continued
his
cross
examination
of
M.
M.
Stephens
when
court
resumed
yesterday
afternoon
and
closely
questioned
the
witness
as
to
why
he
had
said
that
the
property
of
the
i
ompany
between
Moresby
and
Park
Avenues
was
suitable
for
yards
when
It
would
require
a
vast
expenditure
to
prepare
the
property
for
thaf
purpose,
lie
also
asked
the
witness
to
give
off
hand
his
own
valuation
of
certain
pieces
of
land
which
had
been
assessed.
Mr.
Stephens
wt
also
asked
as
to
the
construction
of
floats
at
Cow
Bay
and
to
his
personal
knowledge
of
the
depth
of
.cater
at
different
points
alone
the
waterfront.
Thomas
McClymont.
the
next
witness
j
for
the
city,
gsve
his
opinion
of
values'
I
where
be
had
made
recent
sales
near
to
or
adjacent
to
the
property
of
the
rail-iity
company.
On
Water
Street
he
had
sold
two
lots
for
1430
each,
lie
men
tioned
also
that
the
city.
In
building
the
bridge
over
More
Creek,
had
been,
obliged
to
leave
room
for
the
ooustruc-j
Hon
of
two
railway
tracks
and
that
the
company
had
asked
for
this
when
plans
were
prepared
for
the
construction
of
the
bridge.
At
the
western
end
of
Moresby
Avenue
he
had
sold
two
lots
recently
for
1100
each
which
was
near,
to
one
of
the
areas
mentioned
several
times
by
witnesses
and
counsel
on
both
sides.
On
being
asked
by
Mr.
Jones
as
to
whether
he
had
any
knowledge
of
the
value
of
property
In
other
part
from
sales
he
had
made,
witness
said
that
he
had
also
sold
two
lots
nar
the
mill
which
were
adjacent
to
the
company's
property
for
ll&O
each.
In
Bection
Two
also,
within
five
months,
he
had
sold
two
lota
for
1300
each.
Reference
was
made
to
the
sale
of
certain
sections
to
J.
T.
Duthle
of
Seattle
and
Mr.
McClymont
said
mat
be
had
tried
to
ascertain
whether
any
of
that
property
could
be
purchased
and
)
l
received
the
impression
that
title
could
not
be
given
to
It.
NOKTII
VAM'OI
Vi:R
Afct:MOK
The
manner
of
assessing
waterfront
property
in
North
Vancouver
was
explained
by
II.
C.
Wright,
city
assessor
from
the
southern
city,
who
claimed
that
he
had
assessed
the
land
under
the
water
as
separate
from
the
land
adjoining
the
property.
His
method
of
assessment
had
been
upheld
by
the
courts.
The
witness
described
a
certain
case
In
which
his
assessment
had
been
PACIFIC
CHEAT
EASTERN
RAILWAY
COMPANY
Tr.MIER
Sealed
Tenders
endorsed
"Tender
for
Steamers"
will
be
received
by
the
undersigned
up
to
noon
Thursday,
March
31.
1827.
at
the
ofrices
of
the
Company,
579
Ounsmuir
Street.
Vancouver,
B.C,
for
the
purchase
of
the
hulls,
machinery
and
equipment
of
the
two
steamers
"Operator"
and
'Conveyor."
lying
on
the
south
side
of
the
Nechako
River
at
I
Prince
Oeorge.
1
.
.
uuers
auuuiu
w
jar
mr
s
they
stand,
complete.
i
;
To
arrange
for
Inspection.'
ronrmtihK
rate
with
Mr.
A.
A.
Belbeck.
Prince
Cleor.
DC.
The
lowest
or
any
tender
not
necessarily
accepted.
nOBT.
WILSON.
Ami.
Orneral
Manager.
Vancouver.
B.C..
February
23,
1937.
DEPARTMENT
OF
LANDS
NOTICE
Application
fur
(Irnrlng
Permits
for
the
Application
for
pwmiu
to.
grare
live
-
stock
on
the
Crown
ranges
within
any!
grsrlns
district
of
the
rrovince
oi
Brit-ish
Columbia,
mu.it
be
filed
with
the
District
Forester
at
Fort
Oeorge,
Kam-loops.
Nelson,
Prince
Rupert.
Vancouver,
or
Williams
Lake
on
or
before
March
3
1
it,
1927.
Blank
forma
upon
which'
to
submit
aDDllcatlons
may
he
obtained
from
the
'
District
Foresters
at
the
above
named
places,
or
from
the
Department
or
Lanaa
at
Victoria,
DC.
O.
It.
NADEN,
Deputy
Minister
of
Lands.
Department
of
Lands,
Victoria,
DC
Janusrv
4.
192T
NOTICE
Under
and
by.
virtue
ot
the
provisions
ot
Section
28
of
the
"Mineral
Act,"
no'
tice
&
nereby
grtetr
-Messrs:
Malcolm
Smyth,
,
Edmund
Langls.)
Hswld
Hansen
o
the
undersigned
for
Assessment
Work
performed
on
the
Cordllla
Orovp
of
Mineral
Claims.
Princess
Royal
Islsnd.
Skeena
Mining
Division,
the
sum
ot
1303.88.
and
that
unless
said
persons
pay
their
proportionate
share
of
the
con
of
such
Assessment,
together
with
all
costs
of
advertising,
etc.
to
the
undersigned
s
Rutedsle.
B.C.,
on
or
before
May
12.
1927,
application
will
be
made
to
the
Oold
Commissioner,
Prince
Rupert,
B.C
to
have
their
respective
mteresu
In
the
herein
mentioned
Mining
oroup
ot
Mineral
Claims
vested
IP
the
under-
signed.
DAVID
CORDILLA.
I
JACOB
KOSKl.
2
,ppeajt
being
upheld
by
the
appeal
ln
one
case
he
had
assessed
DroDtrtT
or
1JV)0
and.
In
the
appeal
court.
D.
W.
Reeve,
who
had
given
evl-
dence
for
the
appellant
In
that
case,
j
had
valued
the
property
at
$4,500.
The
i
witness
had.
however,
valued
the
land
j
at
the
same
price
asked
for.
it
and
ati
the
time
of
trial
there
waa
an
option
on
It
for
that
amount.
Later
the
pro-
j
perty
was
mid
ror
ina
amount
icr!the
court.
E.
P.
jonM
WM
forceful
in
which
It
had
been
assessed.
Mr.
Wright
believed
that
waterfront
property
In
Prince
Rupert
should
be
as
valuable
as
In
Norttt
Vancouver
considering
the
fact
that
the
population
was
nearly
the
same.
Cross
examined
by
Mr.
Alexander,
wit
ness
said
that
he
had
known
Mr.
Reeve
for
a
long
time
and
would
place
his
name
among
the
first
six
If
called
upon
to
select
valuatora.
It
was,
however,
a
difference
ol
opinion
In
the
case
he
had
mentioned
In
which
his
decision
had
been
upheld
by
the
court.
At
this
stage
In
the
proceedings,
there
was
considerable
argument
between
counsel
aa
to
the
admissibility
of
a
Journal
of
the
House
Qf
Commons,
certified
by
the.
King's
Printer,
showing
an
item
of
1165,000
In
tba
estimates
for
the
-purchase
of
the
Prince
Itupert
elevator
site.
'
After
the
admission
of
the
document
as
an
exhibit.
Mr.
Jones
called
on
O.
C.
Walker
of
this
city
aa
the
next
witness.
Mr.
Walker
recounted
his
exper
iences
In
real
estate
In
the
past
year
and
a
half
and
said
that
hla
Judgment
had
not
been
In
error
aa
to
values.
Questioned
as
to
hla
knowledge
ol
watrefront
values
the
witness
said
that
he
would
be
pleased
to
but
water-
frot
Property
In
either
block
A.C.E.
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWil
I.TTsWeVaVffl
U
W
MsWIMl
I
or
I
if
possible
as
a
speculative
venture
Mr
Walker
was
the
last
witness
tor
the!
city
and.
for
the
purpose
of
ascertaining
:
Mr.
Nichols
views
as
to
the
procedure
at
the
court
of
revision,
he
was
recalled
to
the
stand
for
a
few
explanations.
INTKKESTINO
MMON
rht
evening
session
proved
to
be
the
most
interesting
.
from
the
spectators'
point
ol
view
of
any
of
tie
sessions
of
nia
nresentatlon
of
the
case
and
.showed
a
familiarity
with
various
cases
which
had
a
bearing
on
the
questions
of
law
which,
he
argued,
had
to
be
considered.
Mr.
Alexander
analyzed
the
evidence
of
various
witnesses
and
at
one
time
referred
to
the
difficulty
of
securing
wit-3
cases
for
an
"outside
corporation."
He
ret
erred
to
the.
evidence
as
showing,
without
contradiction,
that
the
assess
ment
of
city
property
had
been
reduced
33
per
cent
since
1922,
and
the
assess-
mcnt
of
the
company
hsd
been
creased
77
per
cent
In
the
same
period.
This,
in
hla
opinion,
showed,
dlscrlmlna.
tlon.
Witnesses,
he
claimed'
:
had
re-
v
'
f
erred
tt
much
of
the
property
being
ntedcd
for
yards,
while
the
evidence
of'
Mr.
Tobey
showTd
that
there
was
plenty
neferrlng
to
the
possibility
of
the,
if
yardage
for;
sliy
.of
JO.qpo
people.
clty
growtu,
Mr,
Jonea
rWnrcd
to
the
Counsel.
for
the
company
continued
fMt
that
Vancouver
had
only
been
in-to
argue
that
the
city
council
and
the
,
corporated
In
1888.
and
the
develop-ratepayers
had
been
satisfied
with
the,mfnt
ot
that
port
in
the
last
ten
years
agreement
made
in
1922.
whereby
theina(1
bw.n
wonderful.
Such
was
also
company
was
to
pay
M5.000
for
a
period
)Ue
of
porU
to
of
the
Unet
of
five
years.
At
that
yme
the
com-,nd
the
development
of
Prince
Rupert
pany'a
property
was
assessed
at
mUst
be
considered
when
arriving
at
310.000
and
the
mlltage
rate
waa
about
prwnt
day
values.
Mr.
Jones
quotttd
37.
Coming
to
the
manner
of
assessing
I
the
right
of
way
of
the
company,
coun-1
sel
claimed
that
the
assessor
had
erred
in
assessing
tne
rignt-oi-way
for
the
same
value
whether
it
had
been
cleared
lis
l9iasHassssr
rsssT9assssssssssssss7
TWrswOy
,or
not-
In
opening
his
remarks
Mr.
Jones
quoted
two
casea
for
consideration
of
His
Lordship
and
stated
that.
In
his
Tplnlon.
these
outlined
the
principles
on
which
the
appeal
should
be
determined.
It
was
difficult
to
arrive
at
any
valuation
of
the
property
which
could
not.
be
bought
and
was
not
sold.
He
then1
referred
to
the
evidence
of
the
wit
nesses
called
by
the
appellant
ana1
quoted
precedents
s
to
his
idea
of
the:
value
which
should
be
given
expert!
testimony.
Such
evidence
should
be;
crutlnhsed
very
carefully.
i
Mr.
Jones
maintained
that
the
evl-'
deuce
of
Mr.
Arnold
and
Mr.
Reeve
was
similar
to
Mr.
Nlchol'a
and
It
was
very
suggestive
that
the
three
had
agreed
i
in
Jhe
manner
they
had
computed
!
waterfront
values.
It
was,
however,
very
difficult
tor
any,
man
to
come
Into
the
city
from
outside
and
prepare
a
valuation
without
being
familiar
Kh
local
condltlona.
He
claimed
that
Uie
appellants
hsd.
endeavored
to
slngte
out
a
rocs
pile
or
two
ana
were
noi
sonstdtrlng
the
terminal
as
a
whole.
POUT'S
DEVELOPMENT
I
extensively
from
exhibits,
as
to
growth
of
the
port
and
said
that
u,u
ycar
w
the
iM
year
when
any
wheat
had
been
shipped
this
way.
The
amount
ot
freight
paid
on
these
ship.
menta
amounted
to
over
4580.000.
This
waa
an
Indication
ot
what
might
be
expected
In
the
development
of
railway
business.
Counsel
said
that.
"
In
his
.
.
.
opinion,
..,
It
w.
was
out
of
place
for
.
the
company
to
belittle
the
town
and
the
!
IPiospeCU
of
the
city
aa
It
had
an
e.
cellent
railroad
here
which
was
superior
to
the
line
entering
Vancouver.
Before
closing
his
address
counsel
for
the
city
objected
to
the
Jurisdiction
of
His
Lordship
as
there
had
been
nothing
,
entered
in
the
records
showing
that
Judge
Young
had
asked
him
to
sit
In
the
case.
After
some
argument
by
counsel
the
document
wae
admitted
a
an
exhibit
In
the
case
over
the
objec-
tlon
of
Mr.
Jones.
Ills
Lordship
then
briefly
Intimated
that
he
would
hand
down
hli
decision
at
2:30
o'clock
j
today
as
he
was
com-J
!riru
uy
law
iu
ucviuc
vviurv
Muvn
22
and
It
would
not
permit
him
more
lime
even
It;
he
left
It
till
.he
reached
Vancouver
and
mailed
hla
decision
back
h
oy
IITM
nrvt
uoat.
"What
alls
Jones
these
days?"
"His
wife's
Insomnia,
hla
son's
headaches,
his
daughter's
nerves,
and
his
father's
rheumatism,-
f.
(cANAOIArJ
Vcinc
Canadian
Pacific
Railway
B.
C.
Coast
Services
Sailings
from
Prince
Rupert
tn
Ketchikan,
WnincelL
Jnnrau.
Slagwat
rebruary
11.
Marrli
-JJ,
IK,
JM.
In
Vancouver.
Victoria.
.Seattle
February
S3,
.March
II,
22.
.
'
'
'
PRINCESS
rtEATRlrE.
For
llutrdale.
East
Bella
Bella.
O
rean
Falls..
Nainu.
Alert
Bay.
Campbell
River,
and
Vanroaver
every
Saturday,
II
a.nu
Agency
for
all
Steamship
Lines.
Full
Information
front
tT.
&
ORCHARD.
Ileneral
Agent.
Corner
of
4th
Street
and
3rd
Avenue,
Prince
R
a
pert.
ILC.
NAVIGABLE
WATERS
PROTEC-
TION
ACT.
R.S.C.
CHAPTER
113
William
J.
Crawford
hereby
give
notice
he
has.
under
Section
7
ot
the
said
Act.
deposited
with
the.
Minuter
of
Public
Works
at
OtUwa.
and
In
the
office
or
the
District
Registrar
of
the
Land
Registry
District
of
Prince
Rutert
at
Prince
Rupert.
B.C.
a
description
of
the
site
and
the
plana
of
wharf
proposed
to
.
be
built
In
the
Portland
Canal
on
Lot
4607.
District
of
Casslar.
And
take
notice
that
after
the'
exptra--
tlon
of
one
month
from
the
date
of
pub
lication
of
this
notice
William
J.
Craw
ford
will
under
Section
7
of
the
said
Act,
apply
to
the
Minister
of
Public
Works
at
his
office
In
the
city
of
Ottawa
for
approval
ot
the
site
and
plans,
and
for
leave
to
construct
tne
said
wharf.
Dated
at
Stewart.
B.C..
this
3rd
day
ot
March.
1937.
77
W.
J.
CRAWFORD.
IN
PRORATE.
IN
THE
SI'PKEMi:
COI
KT
OF
ItltlTIMI
('(ill
Mill
A
In
the
Matter
ot
the
Administration
Act:
and
In
the
Matter
ot
the
Estate
ot
-Joseph
P.
Bowman.
Deceased.
Intestate.
TAKE
NOTICE
that
by
order
of
His
Honor.
F.
McB.
Voung.
the
24th
day
of
February,
A.D.
1927,
I
waa
appointed
Administrator
ot
the.
estste
of
Joseph
of"-
n
.
P"
having
claims
against
the
said
estate
are
hereby
required
to
furnish
aame,
properly
verified,
to
me
on
or
before
the
94tVi
4th
rtn
day
nf
ot
VfawH
March.
AX).
A
n
1011
-,
.11
parties
Indebted
to
the
estate
are
required
to
pay
the
amount
ot
their
ln
debtedness
to
me
forthwith
NORMAN
A.
WATT.
Official
Administrator.
Prince
Rupert,
B.C.
Dated
the
24th
day
ol
February,
AD.
1927.
.
PACIFIC
STEVEDORING
TOW
TKACTINtt
CO.
LTD.
(IV
VtlLt'NT.UtV
IKH
IIIATION)
NOTICE
TO
C'KEIUTOItH
TAKE
NOTICE
that
m.
Xlmmt
I
n
9
rvf
Creditors.
will
be
held
at
600
Union
Building..
Vletorta,
B.C..
on
Mouday.
the
a,st
t,s7
of
March.
,1927,
at
10
.m
and
..,
,if
-i.m.
...in.,
this
Comnsnv
must
be
filed
with
me
before
that
date,
after
which
I
shall
distribute
the
assets
ot
the
Company
having
regard
only
-to
such
claims
st
have
been
duly
tiled.
VINCENT
C.
MAKTIN,
Liauldstor.
61-
m
Union
Uia,
Victoria,
D
C.
Ccpyritkt.
Canada.
1173
'
"Demers'
Phone
27.
P.O.
Box
327.
Come
and
See
our
$22.50
Georgette
and
Silk
Dresses
LINDSAY'S
Cartage
and
Storage
Phone
63
Cartage,
Warehousing,
and
Distributing.
Team
or
Motor
Service.
Coal
Sand
and
'Gravel;
UVSprrlnlirc
in
Piano
and
Furniture
Moving.
GEORGE
ROR1E
CHARTERED
ACCOUNT.
ANT
AND
AUDITOR
Phone
287
IIS
Mewnd
Avenue
West,
Prlnra
Rupert